Do any.Video-based social media platforms like YouTube and TikTok have taken the world by storm, leading many to dive into the world of editing who would otherwise never have considered it. And as more people have begun spending more time and working from home, software that enables them to edit videos from their computers has been in high demand.You can find dozens of video editing programs on the market with a variety of different features and price tags.
Best Apple For Photo Editing Series To CheckAmong Apple’s latest taglines is, Power to the pro and, if you are looking for the ultimate photo editing experience, you can get on a Mac platformthe desktop models are where you are going to want to look. There are currently three main series to check out if you want a Mac workstation: the iMac Pro, iMac, and Mac Pro. IMac Pro10 years ago I used a laptop to edit literally thousands of photos at night, outside, on a picnic table while my kid was at soccer practice.![]() See my blog post at diglloyd.com for details: 2019 Apple MacBook Pro with 16″ Display: the Single Computer Solution At Last.While desktop computers like the 2019 iMac 5K, iMac Pro and Mac Pro will outperform the 2019 MacBook Pro, meaningful differences will not be seen in real-world usage for 90% of the photographers out there (exceptions being when memory is a limiting factor).Moreover, the convenience of a blazing fast 4TB or 8TB internal SSD is something no Apple desktop computer can match internally. That’s assuming for desktop usage the addition of a keyboard and mouse and external display (you can even close the lid and just use the external keyboard and display, pretending it really is a desktop computer). The gist of that is captured here, but I advise throwing away assumptions when it comes to one’s own work—don’t assume, but measure/test if possible—that’s what I do in order to advise my clients properly.Desktop or laptop, or laptop as a desktop?My judgment is that Apple’s latest 2019 MacBook Pro 16-inch model with 8-core CPU and 64GB memory can be a full-fledged desktop computer replacement, even for demanding users. Compounding the issue, with focus stacking (Sept 2019 issue) and image scaling (Oct 2019 issue), routine tasks can take 5 minutes to an hour.I have done consulting for nearly a thousand clients over the past years about choosing and configuring a system for photography, I’ve honed my skills at getting them the best possible solution for their actual workflow, sometimes saving my clients thousands of dollars they would have thrown at the problem, and yet been of little or no benefit, or even been worse. What once was reasonably speedy starts to feel sluggish. ![]() Accordingly, I still evaluate images on a 2560 X 1600 display with pixel density of 110 dpi. Please see the articles Too-High Pixel Density on 5K and 8K Displays Impedes Image Assessment and 2.5K or 4K or 5K Display for Image Editing and Viewing?, referenced on this page: To cover it in a nutshell: when pixel density it very high (e.g., 220 dpi with Apple iMac 5K), it becomes difficult to assess image sharpness, how much sharpening to apply, etc. The key issue is pixel density and its ramifications for image assessment. Were money not an issue, I’d have an Apple Mac Pro with Apple Pro Display XDR at home, plus the iMac 5K for van usage, using the OWC Thunderblade 8TB SSD for all my data between the two, but that total cost is prohibitive, and is a case of diminishing returns.Components: the display, where pixel density is a tiny problemHere I refer readers to two of my blog posts which cover this matter in detail. The screen is also too small for my work and my eyes too ( presbyopia), so it still requires an external display, and that’s more setup/teardown hassle and desk space.Thus for myself for those reasons and more, the only form factor that is viable for home and on the road in my van is the Apple iMac 5K form factor, which means the iMac 5K or iMac Pro. Its ergonomics are awful when used by itself, e.g., hunching over the built-in keyboard and screen. Remove password of workbook in excel 2007 for macSo most of us will have to be content with 8 CPU cores.The GPU is increasingly used by imaging software, and it is a big help for things like image upscaling with Gigapixel AI, Adobe Camera Raw Enhance Details, though most other Photoshop and Lightroom features hardly use the GPU. For image scaling with 16 CPU cores, even the fastest GPU might be put to shame with Gigapixel AI.It is almost always the smart move to choose more CPU cores over some fancy GPU because CPU cores get used a lot more by imaging software these days and are far more general purpose.Only the 2019 Mac Pro or iMac Pro qualify for the 10+ core CPUs, but you’ll pay a steep premium for high-core-count CPUs from Intel. Eight CPU cores should be considered a starting point—do not even consider 4-core or 6-core CPUs if performance is a key goal.If you regularly do focus stacking as I do, the one thing I’d really like is a 16 core CPU (12 cores would suffice, and 24/28 would be fantastic). It is enough for me too, even though I’d like faster this and that now and again. If those special cases are your thing then it might make sense, but few of us will be in that boat.The 2019 iMac 5K and 2019 MacBook Pro both have solid GPU options that are plenty fast for the vast majority of photographers. But if you get spendy on a fancy high-end external GPU expecting Photoshop to run batshit fast, you’ll be sorely disappointed— excepting a few special cases, Photoshop won’t run faster in any meaningful way. Video processing is a special case—I’m discussing still photography here. ![]() For example, if it takes 0. Consider carefully your storage capacity needs over a 3+ year timeframe for example, were I going with the 2019 MacBook Pro as my sole computer, I would absolutely go with the 8TB SSD (all capacities are soldered onto the logic board, so there is no upgrading of any component, including the SSD).Components: External I/O Speed and bandwidthWith adequate memory, I/O speed largely drops out of the picture when working in Photoshop or Lightroom, because images sit in memory and thus I/O is a blip in the overall context. While Thunderbolt 3 can deliver about 2700 MB/sec, an internal SSD might hit 3400 MB/sec.The smart move is to go with nothing less than a 2TB internal SSD, with 4TB strongly preferred given an assumed 3+ year lifespan of the computer—both capacity and resilience to wear.In the Apple Mac lineup, the 2019 MacBook Pro can have up to a whopping 8TB internal SSD, whereas other models are limited to 2TB or 4TB. That kind of speed lets CPUs and GPU have data when needed with minimum delay, lets the OS run a peak speed, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCrystal ArchivesCategories |